Login | PreferencesMount Bulla Reviews and DiscussionBrowse Australia Victoria Mount Bulla
Questions and AnswersHere are common questions and answers relating to Mount Bulla... Snow Skiing QuestionsThere are currently no questions relating to Mount Bulla in the snow skiing category.Questions from Other CategoriesThe following questions were posted in various Yahoo's categories other than 'Snow Skiing' - hopefully they are relevant: how to stop my leg muscles from hurting?Full question:well the other day i went for a two kilometer run then the next day i had to walk p a steep mountain near mount Bulla, victoria and went freehand rock climbing, but now mt legs are really sore and i can hardly walk, does anyone have any ideas on how to stop them from hurting? Best answer:What you could do is take a small jog on a treadmill but some americans don't have one so I would suggest stretching. It allows oxygen into your muscles. I hate the feeling of aching muscles!!! Boyfriend Vs Ex Boyfriend.?Full question:My girlfriend had this ex boyfriend who she was with for 3 years in their high school years. She's now 20 and i'm turning 21. She's told me everything her and her ex boyfriend have done like having sex like nearly everyday, going with him to mount bulla, seeing him nearly everyday after school etc. However i'm with my girlfriend and she doesn't do anything like that with me. She's working about 50+ hours a week and she doesn't give me any respect or anything. It just kills me that she's loved her ex boyfriend like this and with me she's just kinda using me or something. I'm not comparing me to her ex boyfriend, it's more that i have a feeling like she's not telling me something. Her ex boyfriend still loves her. Anyway what should i go about all this. I just want to leave and go but i don't know how Best answer:she obviosly still hung up on her bf, stop wasting your time and get rid find somebody wants to be with you and not somebody she can compare her ex to Jehovah’s Witnesses how do you know that Jesus Christ returned invisibly in 1914?Full question:I found a part in the book, ‘God’s Word For Us Through’ Jeremiah page 55 that says the following: “Archaeologist Eilat Mazar reports unearthing a small clay seal impression, or bulla. (below left) It was found in 2005 during a supervised excavation of a layer dating back to when jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.CE. The seal bears the ancient Hebrew name "Yehuchal ben Shelemyahu," which is "lucal the son of Shelemiah" in English. later, in a similar layer and just a few yards away, anoth• er bulla was uncovered. (below right) It bears the name "Gedalyahu ben Pashhur," or "Gedaliah the son of Pashhur."” Now take a look at the archeologist reference or source the Watchtower pulled this from: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bible/mazar.html Here are some highlights: Mazar: We do not yet have clear evidence of the destruction. We may in future seasons. But I believe that it was part of the great destruction of Jerusalem in 586 B.C. by the Babylonians. We have lots of other evidence of this destruction nearby. Mazar: At the beginning of the 1980s, Professor Yigal Shiloh, a mentor of mine, excavated an area that includes what is known as the Burnt Room and the Bullae House. In their destruction layer, he found pottery typical of this period together with arrowheads that show that some fight was conducted here. It really revealed the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in 586 B.C. Q: And more evidence for the invasion and destruction has also emerged, is that right? Mazar: Yes. In my excavations at the Ophel, to the south of the Temple Mount, I discovered a royal structure that appears to have been destroyed by an immense fire around 586 B.C. As we excavated, our hands were black with the ashes. And the Bible tells us that the Babylonians set houses on fire. Two years after the discovery of the tiny clay bulla, or stamp, bearing the name of Yehuchal ben Shelemiyahu, Mazar's excavation brought to light a similar stamp from the same location. In ancient Hebrew script, it reads "Gedaliah ben Pashur." Ben Pashur's name appears in the same verse of the Book of Jeremiah (38:1) as ben Shelemiyahu's. Both men, according to the Bible, served as ministers in the court of King Zedekiah, who reigned from 597–587/6 B.C., just prior to the destruction of the First Temple and fall of Jerusalem. The Watchtower uses this interview to try and verify their belief that the time line points to a 1914 date. However, the date is actually 586 B.C. yet they blatantly change the date to 607 B.C. Instead of staying true and honest to Eilat Mazar’s statements, they changed the date to fit their own doctrinal needs. This is deception at its most raw form, using real and facts from real scientist and twisting it to try and reaffirm their doctrines yet fail to present the facts in full. I think they did this because it makes their beliefs to appear to have creditability. Is this why they tell their members not to research outside of the organization’s published works? So they can control the flow of information and feed their members a bias and adjusted facts? The Watchtower can’t deal with the 1914 date being exposed as false, so they lie to their members. This is really wrong indeed. If you dont' want to read watch this video: http://www.freeminds.org/static-content/all-static-content/jehovah-s-witnesses-latest-game-of-deception-jeremiah-book.html The bible on false prohphets: 2 Tim 4:2 [NIV] Preach the Word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage--with great patience and careful instruction. 2 Tim 4:3 For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. 2 Tim 4:4 They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. Best answer:The simple answer is that they don't know, because they've been told that it was invisible, and now more recently they have been told that this invisible 'presence' was not on earth - it all happened in heaven. Back in the early 1900s, they believed this invisible presence would be manifested on earth in a very short space of time by Israel returning to its land, Armageddon etc. But how many JWs today know that their predecessors in the early 1900s were convinced that the invisible presence had happened in 1874? It wasn't changed to 1914 until after 1914! You are right to point out the stubborn refusal of JW leaders to even admit that historians have good reason for a totally different date for the fall of Jerusalem to Babylon, because the 1914 year is wholly dependent on the erroneous date of 607 BC. If the JW leaders draw their followers attention to the 586 BC date and evidence for it, they will then have to disprove that evidence. Which they cannot do. They only give passing mention to the historians' date and go on to give their calculations based upon 607 BC. But it is not accurate to say "they lie to their members" with regard to quoting on this subject; they do selective quoting, and quoting out of context, counting on the fact that hardly any JWs will bother to check the quotes out in their entirety. The JW leaders are culpable because back in the 1980s a JW called Carl Olof Jonsson presented them with 7 separate chronological lines of evidence to prove that Jerusalem fell to the Babylonians in 586/7, not 607. Any Witness desirous of establishing the truth about the 1914 date could do no better than to read the book he produced on this - "The Gentile Times Reconsidered". Another excellent book he has written is called - "Signs Of The Last Days". It demolishes the Society's appeal to supposed increases in earthquakes, wars etc since 1914. Powered by Yahoo! Answers Comments:Your Comments:Have you any got anything to say about skiing or snowboarding at Mount Bulla (e.g. the best trails, tips on getting around the mountain, etc)? Skicow would appreciate your comments. Submit a LinkSkicow.com welcomes you to submit links to relevant pages on the net.Relevant links on this page include:
|